|
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT |
DECISION |
Having regard to Article VI.3 (a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and
DECISION
It is hereby established that Articles 3, 5, 6,
7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20, 21 item 3, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 of
the Law on the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the
Ministries of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official Gazette of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, No. 4/97) are not in conformity with the Constitution of Bosnia
and Herzegovina.
The Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina
is given a three-month time limit from the date of publication of this Decision
in the Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina to bring the aforementioned
provisions of the Law on the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina and
the Ministries of Bosnia and Herzegovina in line with the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
This Decision shall be published in the
Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Official Gazette of the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Official Gazette of the Republika
Srpska.
REASONS
On
1. The evaluation of the constitutionality
of the Law on the Council of Ministers of
2. The Annulment of the confirmation
of the appointment of the Co-chairs of the Council of Ministers of
3. The Annulment of the confirmation
of the appointment of the Vice-Chair, the Ministers and the Deputy Ministers of
the Council of Ministers of
4. The abrogation of all decisions and
other acts of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina “from the date
of the unlawful confirmation by the House of Representatives of the
Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the day of annulment of
this unconstitutional and unlawful confirmation by the Constitutional Court of
Bosnia and Herzegovina”.
The applicant stated that “Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Law on
Ministers and Ministries is contrary to Article V.4 of the Constitution of
Bosnia and
Based on Article 14, paragraph 1 and Article 19 of the Rules of
Procedure of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter:
the Constitutional Court’s Rules of Procedures), the Constitutional Court of
Bosnia and Herzegovina (hereinafter: the Constitutional Court) requested on 17
February 1999 the applicant to submit new information on the substance of the
request, taking into account the provisions of Articles 14, 26 and 27 of the Constitutional
Court’s Rules of Procedure.
In his new request of 24 February 1999, the applicant stresses that the
Law on Ministers and Ministries in Article 6 has a provision which is contrary
the provisions of Article V.4 of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
since “item 1 contains the term Co-chair who is appointed by the Presidency of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, and paragraph 2 starts with the function of Vice-Chair,
which is not recognized by the Constitution, and further specifies that the
Ministers and Deputy Ministers are appointed by the Co-chair, previously
obtaining the opinion of the Presidency, and they assume the functions after
they have been approved by the House of Representatives. It is quite obvious
that there is an inconsistency of the Law on Ministries with the Constitution
of Bosnia and
Regarding the disputed confirmation of appointments, in his new
submission, the applicant mostly stated facts relating to the procedure of
decision-making on the confirmation of appointments (although this is not a
case instituted according to Article IV.3 (f) of the Constitution). He did
not comment on his request for abrogation of the decisions of the Council of
Ministers.
Based on Article 16 of the Constitutional Court’s Rules of Procedure, on
10 March 1999, the adopters of the challenged acts – the Parliamentary Assembly
of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the House of Representatives of the Parliamentary
Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and
Herzegovina – were requested to submit, within a thirty-day period, their reply
to the allegations in the request which are related to acts within their
competence.
In a letter of Dr. Halid Genjac, the Chair of the House of
Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina at the
time, the Constitutional Court was requested to prolong the time-limit for the
reply to the allegations in Mr. Banjac’s request until 30 May 1999,
“considering that the work of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and
Herzegovina has come to a standstill”.
The Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, in its reply of 12
May 1999, stated: “The Council of Ministers considers that it should be
established, first of all, whether the Law on Ministers and Ministries is
unconstitutional, and only then could the question be raised of the legality of
the decisions and other acts which the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and
Herzegovina adopted according to its authority set forth in the Law on
Ministers and Ministries”.
Regarding the request for the evaluation of the constitutionality of the
Law on Ministers and Ministries (Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
No. 4/97), a preliminary question arises as to whether this Law can be subject
of a dispute in terms of Article VI.3 (a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
According to Article VI.3 (a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, the Constitutional Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to
decide any dispute that arises under this Constitution between the Entities,
between Bosnia and Herzegovina and an Entity or Entities, or between institutions
of Bosnia and Herzegovina, including but not limited to: whether an Entity’s
decision to establish a special parallel relationship with a neighboring state
is consistent with this Constitution, including provisions concerning the
sovereignty and territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina; whether any
provision of an Entity’s Constitution or law is consistent with this
Constitution.
The Constitutional Court accepted that the applicant, by requesting the
evaluation of the constitutionality of the Law on Ministers and Ministries,
claiming that Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Law on Ministers and
Ministries were in contravention of Article V, item 4 of the Constitution of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, since item 1 uses the term Co-chair appointed by the
Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and item 2 starts with the function of
Vice-chair, which is not foreseen by the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
and that it is evident that the Law is not consistent with the Constitution of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, challenged all the provisions of the Law which define
the Co-Chairs and the Vice-Chair of the Council of Ministers, and not only
Article 6.
The provisions on the Co-Chairs and the Vice-Chair of the Council of
Ministers are contained in Articles 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20,
21 item 3, and Articles 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 and 29 of the contested law.
Thus, it provides, inter alia, the
following: in Article 3 – that the two Co-Chairs, the Vice-Chair and three
Ministers (foreign affairs; civil affairs and communications; foreign trade and
economic relations) constitute the members of the Council of Ministers of
Bosnia and Herzegovina; in Article 5 – that the Council of Ministers is headed
by the Chair, and that the Co-Chairs rotate in the position of the Chair in
accordance with the Rules of Procedure; in Article 6 – that the Co-Chairs are
appointed by the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Vice-Chair, the
Ministers and the Deputy Ministers are appointed by the Co-Chairs with the previously
obtained opinion of the Presidency, and that all members of the Council of
Ministers and deputy ministers assume their functions after they have been
approved by the House of Representatives; in Article 20 – that decisions of the
Council of Ministers come in effect when signed by the Co-Chairs and the
Vice-Chair. Other provisions regulate in detail the functions of the Co-Chairs
and the Vice-Chair of the Council of Ministers and, accordingly, of the Council
of Ministers as a whole.
Article V.4 of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina defines the
Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is composed of the Chair
of the Council of Ministers and a certain number of ministers as may be
appropriate, who are responsible for the implementation of the policy and the
decisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina from within the competencies of the
institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina; the Presidency of Bosnia and
Herzegovina appoints the Chair of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, who assumes the office upon the approval by the House of
Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina; the
Chair of the Council of Ministers appoints the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the
Minister of Foreign Trade and other ministers as may be appropriate (no more
than two thirds of the ministers may be appointed from the territory of the
Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina), who assume the office upon the approval
by the House of Representatives; also, the Chair appoints deputy ministers (who
may not be from the same constituent people as their ministers), who assume the
office upon the approval by the House of Representatives.
It follows from what has been stated above that the challenged
provisions of the law defining the Co-Chairs and the Vice-Chair of the Council
of Ministers are not in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, since the Constitution clearly establishes the traditional
function of a Prime Minister designate who also appoints the ministers according
to Article V.4 of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Therefore, there
is substantive unconstitutionality of the challenged legal provisions, and the
Article 56 paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of the Constitutional Court’s Rules of
Procedure provides that in a decision establishing the inconsistency under
Article VI.3 (a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the
Constitutional Court may grant the adopter of the act a period, not exceeding
three months, within which it is to adapt the act accordingly. If the
incompatibility was not eliminated within the set period, the
Taking into account the aforesaid provisions of the
Regarding the request to annul the confirmation of appointment of the
Co-Chairs and the Vice-Chair of the Council of Ministers, the Constitutional
Court finds that the confirmation of appointment was carried out by the
decisions of the House of Representatives of the Parliamentary Assembly of
Bosnia and Herzegovina, on the basis of the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina and Article 6 of the Law on Ministers and Ministries.
In the context of this decision, whereby the
The
The
President of the Constitutional Court Prof. Dr. Kasim Begić,
Judges: Marko Arsović, Dr. Hans Danelius, Prof. Dr. Louis Favoreu, Prof.
Dr. Joseph Marko, mag.iur. Zvonko Miljko, Azra Omeragić and Mirko Zovko.
|
U
1/99 Neum |
Prof.
Dr. Kasim Begić President
of the Constitutional Court |
|
The provisions of the Law on Ministers and
Ministries establishing Co-Chairs and a Vice-Chair of the Council of
Ministers are not in conformity with the Constitution of |
The Constitutional Court of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, sitting at a session held on
CORRECTION
of its Decision no. U 1/99 of
I
As regards the first sentence of the operative
part of the aforementioned Decision, the following corrections shall be made:
the wording "paragraph 1" shall be added after the wording
"Article 3", the wording "paragraph 2" shall be added after
the number "7", the wording "paragraph 2" shall be added
after the number "19", the wording "paragraph 1" shall be
added after the number "28" and the wording "paragraphs 3 and
4" shall be added after the number "29".
ALTERNATIVELY
The first sentence of the operative part of the
aforementioned Decision shall read as follows: It is hereby established that
Article 3 paragraph 1, Articles 5 and 6, Article 7 paragraph 2, Articles 9, 10,
11, 12, 13 and 15, Article 19 paragraph 2, Article 20, Article 21 paragraph 3,
Articles 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27, Article 28 paragraph 1 and Article 29
paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Law on the Council of Ministers and Ministries of
Bosnia and Herzegovina ("Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina",
no. 4/97) are not in conformity with the Constitution of Bosnia and
Herzegovina.
II
This correction shall be published in the
Official Gazette of Bosnia and
|
U 1/99 Sarajevo,
28 January 2000 |
Biljana Potparic Acting Secretary of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and
Herzegovina |